
|
Call Centers Save Time and
Money with Online Training
|

|
|
|
|
Calibration |
One of the major
problems in call center trainings is the lack of metrics and objective
standards for voice training. AAT has developed an international scale
of accent from a standard American 5.0 to a heavily accented 2.0.
(Below this level, language remediation is required.)
FAQ:
"How can
you score a person's accent with such a short recording?"
When you are grading for grammar and vocabulary, you do need a much
longer sample to adequately gauge an individual's level. With accent,
however, we are listening for such a particular and finite skillset
that it can be done with a short recording. For standardization
purposes, we have used the same sentence for thousands of recordings,
and it is immediately apparent when the benchmarks of intonation, voice
quality, and pronunciation have been met.
|
In order to hear two audio clips of similar levels from different
trainees, click the comparison audio and the 4.25 player below to
compare them. Click the 5.0 to compare with an American. (4.75, 4.50
and 4.00 are dead links.)

|
This comparison audio is
of the same accent level and voice quality as a typical 4.25.
|
5.00 |
 |
This is an example of a
standard American Accent and an exceptional speaking voice. Notice the
deep, mellifluous voice, the smooth confidence and the authoritative
presentation.
|
4.75 |
 |
This is just a shade off
standard. He hs a good, deep voice, but is a bit over-precise. He needs
to be a little smoother, instead of this slightly staccato delivery.
|
4.50 |
 |
Smooth voice, but he makes his
statement sound like a question and pronounces "words" as [weudz]
rather than the standard [wrdz].
|
4.25 |
 |
Nice voice quality, but edges
toward non-standard in that he stresses the wrong words. Mispronounces
the L in "people" and the R in "words," saying [wrts] rather than the
standard [wrdz].
|
4.00 |
 |
Good voice quality, but has some pronunciation
problems. Says DHYME instead of TIME, and the vowel duration on WAY is
too long. |
|
|
|
|
|